<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jeannot Muller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeannot.me/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeannot.me</link>
	<description>Technology doesn&#039;t matter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Doesn&#8217;t Innovate by Bill Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://jeannot.me/2013/04/21/apple-doesnt-innovate/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Eldridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeannot.me/?p=2179#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that this question keeps coming up makes me think few understand innovation. What&#039;s worse, it puts into question of how people can do sales.
Of course Apple innovates - think Quicktime, iTunes, the AppStore, iPhone, iPad, iTV, successive lines of MacBooks....
You might question whether they innovate successfully - which these days seems to mean their stock price, not their revenues or profit margin which are still fine.
It might mean &quot;innovate as consistently successful as Steve Jobs&quot;, which hasn&#039;t always been a compliment (look back at 2001-2002) - but is key in the post-Jobs era.
But we also seem to ignore process innovation - such as Agile methods, or WalMart&#039;s revolutionary hub approach to delivery.
Most business innovation is incremental. Complete blue sky innovation is risky and often unnecessary. 
The iPhone success was arguably only a bit about a phone - much was about successful carriage deal with AT&amp;T, a pleasant user experience with the AppStore, significant apps and content based on iTunes, and lessons learned + design taken from the very successful iPod.
In terms of what people think of as pure &quot;innovation&quot;, iPhone was more akin to what RedHat did in transforming Linux into decent usable distributions. It was at heart incremental, but holistic - the user experience took 2 giant steps ahead.
But in terms of features, well, it wasn&#039;t about features. It was about a usable system that left a satisfied customer.
And the common wisdom in sales is, &quot;don&#039;t sell features - sell value&quot;. Along with &quot;don&#039;t compete on price&quot;. You would think Apple following these simple guidelines would be met with &quot;like, well duh!&quot; Instead, there&#039;s disbelief - &quot;how can they succeed without x, y and z, or when so-and-so did this before?&quot;
Innovation is about successful change, which is something akin to fulfilling vision. Visions usually aren&#039;t cluttered with wishlists and schematics. They&#039;re about an idea that precedes and gets modified along with the plan, including priorities required.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that this question keeps coming up makes me think few understand innovation. What&#8217;s worse, it puts into question of how people can do sales.<br />
Of course Apple innovates &#8211; think Quicktime, iTunes, the AppStore, iPhone, iPad, iTV, successive lines of MacBooks&#8230;.<br />
You might question whether they innovate successfully &#8211; which these days seems to mean their stock price, not their revenues or profit margin which are still fine.<br />
It might mean &#8220;innovate as consistently successful as Steve Jobs&#8221;, which hasn&#8217;t always been a compliment (look back at 2001-2002) &#8211; but is key in the post-Jobs era.<br />
But we also seem to ignore process innovation &#8211; such as Agile methods, or WalMart&#8217;s revolutionary hub approach to delivery.<br />
Most business innovation is incremental. Complete blue sky innovation is risky and often unnecessary.<br />
The iPhone success was arguably only a bit about a phone &#8211; much was about successful carriage deal with AT&amp;T, a pleasant user experience with the AppStore, significant apps and content based on iTunes, and lessons learned + design taken from the very successful iPod.<br />
In terms of what people think of as pure &#8220;innovation&#8221;, iPhone was more akin to what RedHat did in transforming Linux into decent usable distributions. It was at heart incremental, but holistic &#8211; the user experience took 2 giant steps ahead.<br />
But in terms of features, well, it wasn&#8217;t about features. It was about a usable system that left a satisfied customer.<br />
And the common wisdom in sales is, &#8220;don&#8217;t sell features &#8211; sell value&#8221;. Along with &#8220;don&#8217;t compete on price&#8221;. You would think Apple following these simple guidelines would be met with &#8220;like, well duh!&#8221; Instead, there&#8217;s disbelief &#8211; &#8220;how can they succeed without x, y and z, or when so-and-so did this before?&#8221;<br />
Innovation is about successful change, which is something akin to fulfilling vision. Visions usually aren&#8217;t cluttered with wishlists and schematics. They&#8217;re about an idea that precedes and gets modified along with the plan, including priorities required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is the wait for Surface Pro now obsolete? by PBX</title>
		<link>http://jeannot.me/2013/01/14/is-the-wait-for-surface-pro-now-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PBX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramgad.com/?p=1725#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I only thought that only Ipads can be jail broken. So there&#039;s no need to buy a Surface Pro then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I only thought that only Ipads can be jail broken. So there&#8217;s no need to buy a Surface Pro then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
